Index » PageStream Support » General » Difference between Pagestream and Pagestream Pro? |
Sign in to add a comment. | Pages: 1 |
2012-02-13 01:00:29 CT | #1 |
---|---|
Frank Swygert From: United States Registered: 2012-01-08 Posts: 22 |
What are most people using? I couldn't find anything stating the differences on the website -- which needs updating!! I'm using Firefox on Mint 12 (Ubuntu based) and the text on some of the pages obviously stops at the bottom but should continue. |
2012-02-12 19:28:56 CT | #2 |
---|---|
David L. Stevens From: United States Registered: 2006-02-23 Posts: 567 |
On 2/12/2012 7:00 PM, farna@att.net wrote: PageStream Pro includes add-ons that we used to have to buy separately -- *** |
2012-02-13 15:59:09 CT | #3 |
---|---|
Frank Swygert From: United States Registered: 2012-01-08 Posts: 22 |
I guess the big question is are these add-ons really worth the extra money for the average guy? I publish a 24 page hobby magazine (8 page asmaple at www.amc-mag.com if interested). I suppose TextFX might be needed, but I don't do a lot of fancy text -- the most I do is skew or angle (rotate) the text boxes. Looks like the standard edition will do that. I do all my photo editing using GIMP right now, looking for something a little less powerful and easier to use as most of what I'm doing is resizing and changing tone/contrast. --- In PageStreamSupport@yahoogroups.com, "David L. Stevens" <dave_stevens@...> wrote: |
2012-02-13 10:36:30 CT | #4 |
---|---|
David L. Stevens From: United States Registered: 2006-02-23 Posts: 567 |
For the average guy? Yes, IMO. For EVERY average guy? I dunno. On 2/13/2012 9:59 AM, farna@att.net wrote:
*** |
2012-02-13 18:10:03 CT | #5 |
---|---|
T.J. Zweers From: Netherlands Registered: 2006-02-07 Posts: 331 |
Hi all! Don't forget PDF import. And some more! Theo Op 13-2-2012 2:28, David L. Stevens schreef:
|
2012-02-13 13:57:54 CT | #6 |
---|---|
Tim Doty From: United States Registered: 2006-02-06 Posts: 2939 |
> What are most people using? I couldn't find anything stating the differences on the website -- which needs updating!! I'm using Firefox on Mint 12 (Ubuntu based) and the text on some of the pages obviously stops at the bottom but should continue. I've been on PgS Pro for some time now. IIRC the main differences are: - ability to turn text into a path I'm probably missing something. If you are handy with vector graphics the additional borders aren't that big of a deal as you can create your own (or use some else's, I've done a few). The graphics filters are lost on me: I don't do that sort of thing in PgS, but in the Gimp or Photoshop. The text capabilities on the other hand are really nice to have. Tim Doty |
2012-02-13 14:03:43 CT | #7 |
---|---|
Tim Doty From: United States Registered: 2006-02-06 Posts: 2939 |
Hey Theo! On Feb 13, 2012, at 11:10 AM, Theo Zweers wrote: > Hi all! Yeah, forgot that one. It is in the what I call "mixed bag" category. Every now and then I try it out and it sometimes works well enough to be useful. What really matters is your use case: The import filter doesn't make PageStream a PDF editor, rather it converts the PDF into its own internal representation. It does a pretty good job at that, but that *is* what it does. Consequently text may be broken into pieces, things not translated nicely, etc. If you have a need to create a new document based on an existing PDF then it may help get over the initial hurdle of importing objects, etc. and leave you with a decent base for completing the work. I rarely have any work that would qualify for the PgS import use case so it isn't that useful to me. Tim Doty > |
2012-02-14 08:11:49 CT | #8 |
---|---|
Russell Butler From: United Kingdom Registered: 2006-02-15 Posts: 126 |
On Mon, 13 Feb 2012 14:03:43 -0600, Tim Doty wrote: > Hey Theo! > On Feb 13, 2012, at 11:10 AM, Theo Zweers wrote: >> Hi all! > Yeah, forgot that one. It is in the what I call "mixed bag" category. > The import filter doesn't make PageStream a PDF editor, rather it > If you have a need to create a new document based on an existing PDF > I rarely have any work that would qualify for the PgS import use case It's not a tool I use much, but when I *did* need it, it was very nice to It's also nice because you can import a pdf into an *existing* PGS document,
I'd never steal a tagline...well almost never... Russell Butler A1200 Power Tower, Blizzard 50mhz 060 with SCSI wurzel@jerseymail.co.uk weather: Partly Cloudy : 6.00 C, 42.80 F |
2012-02-22 14:42:28 CT | #9 |
---|---|
Frank Swygert From: United States Registered: 2012-01-08 Posts: 22 |
AH-ha!! Something I may have a use for!! converting the PDF to a PGS document rocks! May have to do some editing? Better than recreating the whole thing! I was using PageMaker 6 on a PC, but saved all my documents as PDF files as well as native PM6 files. So I may have some editing, but can pull one of my old documents in and edit it for a template instead of recreating the whole thing from scratch... super! I'll see how well that works... hopefully no big surprises, but if it cuts a bit of work it will be worth it. Thanks Theo and Tim, you made my decision easier. --- In PageStreamSupport@yahoogroups.com, Tim Doty <thoromyr@...> wrote: |
2012-02-23 17:13:43 CT | #10 |
---|---|
Bart Mathias From: United States Registered: 2007-01-13 Posts: 320 |
On 02/22/2012, farna@att.net wrote: > AH-ha!! Something I may have a use for!! converting the PDF to a PGS It seemed so to me, too. I have templates, and I have PgS copies of things I So I tried. Theo referred to "PDF import." My 5.0.5.8 Pro for Amiga only has "1. Select the Object tool from the Toolbox. "Select a file in the Place Graphic file selector. Click Open. "3. Select the import options. "The Place Graphic dialog box will appear. The options available will depend Object tool, I have. No "Place Graphic" that I can see in the File menu. So |
Sign in to add a comment. | Pages: 1 |
Index » PageStream Support » General » Difference between Pagestream and Pagestream Pro? |