Also OS X 10.4.8 here. I think you will find that a lot of Mac users keep up
with the latest OS upgrades.

Dan Parker

On 31/10/06 21:51 , "PageStreamMacintoshBeta@yahoogroups.com"
<PageStreamMacintoshBeta@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

> There are 3 messages in this issue.
>
> Topics in this digest:
>
> 1a. PageStream for OSX
> From: Dan
> 1b. Re: PageStream for OSX
> From: Terence Casey
> 1c. Re: PageStream for OSX
> From: Nigel Richman
>
>
> Messages
> ________________________________________________________________________
>
> 1a. PageStream for OSX
> Posted by: "Dan" dan@pagestream.org
> Date: Mon Oct 30, 2006 9:31 pm (PST)
>
>
> The quick question I have is what version of OSX are people running? The
> code is supposed to run down to 10.1, but I think 10.2 is more reasonable.
>
> (I'm building an application bundle for a public release. It needs to be
> easier than it is right now.)
>
> Gotta get some ZZZ.
>
> Dan
\

And a lot don't.

Leslie Bell

On Oct 31, 2006, at 4:18 AM, Dan Parker wrote:

> Also OS X 10.4.8 here. I think you will find that a lot of Mac users
> keep up
> with the latest OS upgrades.
>
> Dan Parker
>
>
> On 31/10/06 21:51 , "PageStreamMacintoshBeta@yahoogroups.com"
> <PageStreamMacintoshBeta@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
>
>> There are 3 messages in this issue.
>>
>> Topics in this digest:
>>
>> 1a. PageStream for OSX
>> From: Dan
>> 1b. Re: PageStream for OSX
>> From: Terence Casey
>> 1c. Re: PageStream for OSX
>> From: Nigel Richman
>>
>>
>> Messages
>> ______________________________________________________________________
>> __
>>
>> 1a. PageStream for OSX
>> Posted by: "Dan" dan@pagestream.org
>> Date: Mon Oct 30, 2006 9:31 pm (PST)
>>
>>
>> The quick question I have is what version of OSX are people running?
>> The
>> code is supposed to run down to 10.1, but I think 10.2 is more
>> reasonable.
>>
>> (I'm building an application bundle for a public release. It needs to
>> be
>> easier than it is right now.)
>>
>> Gotta get some ZZZ.
>>
>> Dan
> \
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>